.. 
  Mum’s dad Norman, on the other hand, was as bald as a badger (what does 
  that mean?) well before he died at the frighteningly young age of 55. I can 
  remember touching his clammy pate when we were jumping all over him at the end 
  of the day as he tried to relax with a glass of scotch in his enormous red leather 
  armchair, the one with the vents in the cushion that sighed satisfyingly when 
  you sat in it. Or jumped up and down on it. I think it was due to sweat that 
  his head was so clammy, but it could have been some early hair product employed 
  to glue down a desperate comb-over.
  Skulls.. Hmmm..
  I think it was Stephen Fry that alerted me to this bit of recent history that 
  we tend to overlook these days. It was a quite interesting fact about phrenology, 
  the practice of interpreting the bumps on people’s skulls, which Arthur 
  Conan Doyle set great store by apparently, but which is generally discredited 
  these days, mostly because it was associated with racial stereotyping, which 
  was seized on by the Nazis, of course. 
  I thought that was about all there was to it, but I was wrong, because around 
  about the same time I heard a radio doco about the practice of eugenics and 
  mass sterilisations in North Carolina in particular, and I was staggered at 
  how widespread the practice was in the US in general and how long it persisted. 
  In fact, the sterilisation program in North Carolina lasted from 1933 to 1977, 
  but it seems of all the thirty-two states that adopted similar programs, laid 
  back and groovy California was the most avid practitioner of compulsory sterilisation 
  – there were reportedly 20,000 such procedures authorised between 1909 
  and the mid-sixties. (See 
Wikipedia)
  I need to pause for breath here, because I have to adjust my view of the leader 
  of the Free World yet again. But we should remember that Australia’s Stolen 
  Generations policy was also guided by those same principles of eugenics. 
  While these state endorsed programs have largely disappeared, there’s 
  another related problem I read about just today under the heading 
Disabled 
  'sterilised illegally'
  Parents and carers of the disabled are regularly doctor shopping and going 
  abroad to have their children sterilised illegally, according to the Australian 
  Human Rights Commission.
  Under Australian law, only the Family Court or a guardianship tribunal can authorise 
  the irreversible medical procedure.
  But national Disability Discrimination Commissioner Graeme Innes said anecdotal 
  evidence suggested unauthorised non-therapeutic and forced sterilisation were 
  still common in Australia.
  Mr Innes is seeking to have the practice criminalised, with penalties as harsh 
  as imprisonment. 
read 
  more 
  It’s all too depressing really. But wasn’t this P&W supposed 
    to be about something trivial?
    Oh right – surreal.
    Well, the evolution/corruption of the English language is just another irritant 
    for us hapless baby-boomers as we slide into the abyss of irrelevance, just 
    as it has been for hundreds of successive generations of English speakers. 
    The latest word I’ve detected being devalued by its misuse and/or overuse 
    is ‘surreal’. ‘It was bloody surreal’, he said at 
    the end of the footy match. ‘It was surreal’, describing a car 
    accident. ‘It was surreal’, describing Spectrum’s recent 
    appearance on the LWTTT tour.
    I would accept ‘unreal’, which itself was done over thoroughly 
    in the ‘70s. ‘Surreal’, however, has a quite specific meaning, 
    of which I’m sure you’re aware, but I was going to expand on it 
    anyway - until I got side-tracked again.